Jump to Navigation

WASC

Educational Effectiveness Report submitted

On December 9, 2011, CalArts submitted its Educational Effectiveness Report (EER) to WASC and the Visiting Team who will be evaluating the Institute March 7 - 9, 2012. You can read the EER Report here and learn more about the upcoming visit on WASC's website

The latest from the WASC Steering Committee...

At the WASC Steering Committee meeting on Monday, March 7, we discussed the steps we need to take to complete our Educational Effectiveness Report, which will be due in December.

 

The main areas that CalArts need to work on are: 

  • Refining the budgeting and planning process that comes out of Program Review. How are the outcomes received and dealt with at the School and Institute levels?

  • Define the spectrum of "success" in graduation and retention of students. 

  • Review and study the "persistence of art practice" in alumni as evidence of achievement in graduates

  • Define and refine decision-making structures. How do decisions get made when policy doesn't exist to govern them? What is the path to understanding how an institutional decision gets made (for students, staff, and faculty)? What are the policy oversight areas for particular bodies (such as Academic Council and Deans Council)? What happens when people make decisions that go against policy?

Those topics will form the basis of the Steering Committee's work for the rest of the semester, along with co-curricular review and other trailing issues from our Capacity and Preparatory Review. 

WASC Educational Effectiveness Review (EER) Dates

This just in: CalArts' Education Effectiveness Review (EER) visit will be March 7 - 9, 2012, and the EER report is due on December 14, 2011. WASC has posted sample EER reports, and the visit will be similarly structured to the Capacity and Preparatory Review (CPR) visit that CalArts had in February 2010.

As the Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO), I'll be the report's primary compiler, with the main contributions coming from the WASC Steering Committee. There will be lots of opportunities for input, review, and comment by the CalArts community in the lead-up to the report's submission. 

WASC: a look back at 2010

Justine Garrett here, CalArts' Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) to WASC and Assistant Provost for Academic Affairs:

It's the last Friday of the Fall 2010 semester and a good time to recap where we are with WASC. Since 2007, CalArts has been undergoing its regular reaffirmation of accreditation process, a cyclical process that results in our continued accreditation and ability to award Federal financial aid to our students. 

Just over a year ago, CalArts turned in its Capacity and Preparatory Review Report. In February, CalArts had a Capacity and Preparatory Review (CPR) WASC visit, which resulted in this report from the visiting team. As a result of that visit and the report, we received a "Commission Action Letter" from WASC, summing up the CPR and outlining the four main areas that we have to tackle for the Educational Effectiveness Review (EER). (CalArts people need to sign in to view both documents.) 

In addition to those four areas outlined in the Commission Action Letter -- Decision-Making Processes, Peer Review, Assessment, and Planning & Resources -- CalArts needs to show during the EER that not only do we have the capacity to fulfill our mission, we are effective at doing so, and we meet WASC's Standards and criteria for review. You can read all about the WASC Standards and the reaffirmation of accreditation process in the WASC Handbook of Accreditation

The Educational Effectiveness Report will be due in Fall 2011 with the EER campus visit in Spring 2012. The goal is to have CalArts' accreditation reaffirmed at the WASC Commission meeting soon after the visit. 

On campus, the WASC Steering Committee is organizing the reaffirmation of accreditation process. Please contact any of these people if you would like more information about what's going on.

Also! I love going to meetings. Your meetings. Especially meetings where clarity and understanding results. I am a campus resource for facts about anything related to our WASC accreditation and what we need to do to keep it. You can find me in the Provost's Office or email or call. I'm going to invite myself if I don't hear from you. 

I'll be updating this blog regularly to keep you up-to-date with the WASC process and related activities. You'll hear more from me in the New Year. 

Welcome to the WASC Blog

What does WASC mean to you? (Students. Faculty. Staff.)

If you're a student:

Some of the primary focuses of WASC are educational efficiency and effectiveness and the improvement of student learning. Recently, the WASC Steering Committee has been working with the faculty within each department of the school to refine the learning goals of each of the programs offered at CalArts. To aid in the structuring of each program, rubrics have been in the process of being created and executed, by the faculty, to better provide evidence and a framework of the educational goals the school has for students at the undergraduate and graduate levels in accordance with the WASC accreditation standards. These rubrics, as of the Fall 2008 semester, have become an integral part of the student mid-residence and graduation reviews and will continue to be so in order to ensure that educational standards are being met for the students. The rubrics will also aid in setting the syllabi for each of the classes to guarantee that the learning goals for the classes are concurrent with the programs.

CalArts and WASC will continually be reviewing the program designs and classes to maintain and improve educational standards. In these reviews, they will be using the rubrics as well as student responses that received from surveys of alumni and graduating students. They will also be using statistics of student learning with in the school, assessed using data tracking achievement, satisfaction, and campus climate, along with the course evaluations offered at the conclusion of each semester. This will also mean looking at the relationship between teaching student learning and scholarship. Both WASC and CalArts are concerned with trying to keep student support services, such as financial aid, computer lab accessibility, academic advisement, and career counseling, designed to meet the needs of students applying and currently attending CalArts.

One area that WASC and CalArts are constantly trying to improve is the communication between students and faculty of the expectations that are required of the school and its students. This goes especially for students that are transferring into CalArts, so as to ensure that they are not at a
disadvantage.

If you're faculty:

CalArts faculty will be asked to participate in a number of ways during the WASC accreditation process. Each school has one or two representatives on the WASC Steering Committee and will keep their faculty updated on their progress. Faculty will be asked for input in the development/refinment of goals for their programs. Program heads will then use the goals to develop rubrics for the progression of students as they move through the program. These rubrics have been applied starting in the Spring 2009 semester at mid-residence and graduation reviews. A syllabus for each course taught will be required from all faculty and should include the relevance of the course as applied to the goals of the program.

At each stage of the five year WASC accreditation process there may be additional information requested that would help the Provost's Office as they compile the materials presented to the visiting WASC team. Please contact the Steering Committee representatives or the Provost's Office with questions.

If you're staff:

CalArts has committed to staff development as part of its reaffirmation of accreditation process. Staff members also serve as members of the WASC Steering Committee. It is important for all members of the CalArts staff to be aware of the process and the importance of WASC. Staff members may be engaged by visitors during the WASC campus visits. Much evaluation is about the learning process of our students therefore every office at the Institute will be impacted directly or indirectly.

Syndicate content
Close Menu
Open Menu