Jump to Navigation

The President as Metaphor: article by novelist, essayist and faculty member Steve Erickson

November 5, 2012
The American Prospect

Every election, candidates stress that the future of the country is at stake. Could it be true this time?

Character is destiny, said the Greek philosopher Heraclites—a romantic, maybe, since the implication is that sooner or later the good guy wins. It’s probably a character flaw on my part, indicative of smugness, to assume this maxim will be tested tomorrow on Election Day in terms of both the two presidential candidates running and the country itself. Such an assumption implies that the good guy’s identity is evident. This may not be the first time in our lives when a national election is about nothing less than the meaning of America. More than 1968 or 1932, however, the views and values of both sides are so distinctly different that what’s unsettling isn’t each side believing the other represents the forces of darkness and that the future of the country is at stake; everybody believes these things during a heated campaign. What’s unsettling is that, for once, these things may be true. This is what makes tomorrow such a dreadful crossroads and what makes after tomorrow such an inevitably daunting path.  Read story

Categories: 
News feed
Categories: 
Critical Studies
Categories: 
Steve Erickson
Close Menu
Open Menu